When Banksters Don’t Like the Law, Their Hired Hands in the Legislature Change It
In an excellent piece, Lawyer Roy Oppenheim warns that the Florida Legislature is moving to legalize bank theft of homes. See his piece here.
As I’ve been writing for years, foreclosure is theft in most cases. You see, in their hurry to package mortgages into securities, the banksters virtually never followed the law. I won’t go through the details here again, but they were supposed to follow property law that requires documentation of property sales and as well documents sales of mortgages. Apparently they never did that. Most of the documents were destroyed–a business practice recommended by the banksters’ Frankenstein monster, MERS. Almost all property records in the USA are now suspect.
At first the homeowners and their lawyers as well as judges had no idea–the banks swiftly foreclosed–illegally taking homes away from rightful owners and selling them. As the information about bankster fraud came into the light, homeowners started fighting back, and in a few cases the judges started siding with them.
That threw a monkeywrench into the illegal foreclosures. It slowed things down, giving homeowners a chance to keep their homes. There was more pressure on banksters to try to find ways to work out some debt relief–as that was less costly than contentious foreclosures.
Banksters hate that, though. They want to steal the homes, cheaply and swiftly.
So what is a bankster going to do? Turn to the hired hands in the legislatures, of course. They bought the politicians, so now it is time to change the law after-the-fact. Legalize the fraudulent foreclosures.
This has always been the danger. We know that Washington will not investigate, let alone prosecute, bankster fraud. That meant the only chance for homeowners was to fight it out in the court system. But what if “elected” politicians change the law to retroactively legalize theft? Then there’s no remedy.
Here are excerpts from Oppenheim’s piece. It is must reading. And if you live in Florida (or anywhere else in America) you ought to be “mad as hell”.
Florida proposed legislation – HB 87 and SB 1666 – which backers claim will clear the backlog of foreclosure cases in Florida instead invites bank fraud and creates more problems by putting speed ahead of justice.
The backlog is blamed on foot dragging by homeowners. In reality, banks are to blame due to federal directives to pursue loss mitigation alternatives or by voluntarily slowing down the process to explore settlement options in the interests of both parties and the market.
However long it takes to conclude a foreclosure in Florida, given the magnitude of bank fraud, forgery and abuses that the banks admitted to, we should exempt this category of civil court cases from “time to complete” requirements.
Public policy decisions should not be based on unverified, incorrect and misleading information, particularly when that data is provided by the same industry that admitted wrongdoing.
The next problem behind any push for foreclosure reform is that the market is improving. Florida home prices have rebounded, due in part to the fact that banks and homeowners are managing the backlog of foreclosures.
Short sales and negotiated resolutions which yield higher returns than faster foreclosures would disappear under the proposed legislation.
Only institutional buyers will win. When they buy in bulk, they exclude Realtors who profit from short sales and other end user transactions. Instead of supporting this legislation, Florida’s Realtors should take California’s lead and oppose attempts to speed up foreclosures….
It is undisputed that those responsible for the foreclosure crisis are the financial institutions that filed these cases. These settlements should lead to more protections, not lowered standards. The full magnitude of bank wrongdoing has not been fully revealed, and even more will be swept under the rug.
8 Responses to “When Banksters Don’t Like the Law, Their Hired Hands in the Legislature Change It”
Why such a silence from MMY on Cyprus? You are wasting your chance of proving relevant. Not a peep from Kelton, Wray, Flullwiler, Mitchell, some short points from Mosler without any discussion. Too bad. 🙁
You've stated elsewhere that “money is a public monopoly”.
This is confusing for many people, given that today most of what we call ‘money’ is created by private banks in the form of deposits.
How can money be a “public monopoly” if most ‘money’ is created by private banks?
I’m trying to think of an appropriate analogy – i.e. of a “monopoly” in which the “monopolist” creates only a small fraction of the thing in question. I can’t think of one.
What’s the simplest way to explain, or resolve, the apparent contradiction between “money is a public monopoly” and “most money is created by private banks”?
l randall wray – yOU'RE ALWAYS A 'MUST READ'.
I saw this piece on the Wall Street Journal and was surprised that they are barely catching up to this. Wray has been writing about this since a year ago. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324…
Here Here! Some lawyers and consumer groups have made efforts to push back against this legislative takeover by Banksters but the fight needs more consumers Screaming NO!
A foreclosure is based basically on a confessed judgment, that's why in nonjudicial states only advertising the home for sale is allowed.
The core issue is that the homeowner breached the contract for not making timely payments and agreed that if they did, the bank could take their home, no muss, no fuss.
The ONLY methodology for saving the home is to examine that contract to see if the other side breached first, there are errors, or tortious conduct like appraisal fraud, if not the bank will get the home.
Mortgage Fraud Examiners has exposed the latest foreclosure rescue scam–"Pretender Defenders" http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/03/21/mortgage-…
Randall, please watch this to better understand…
1) Why one of the most basic assumptions in modern economics and portfolio theory is wrong
2) When and why it happened
3) How it propagated to today
4) Why wealth inequality is inherent in the mistake
and curiously…. that the prevailing community will not hear him out although the Royal Society has published him and one of the 3 Nobel Laureates that unknowingly propagated the mistake has admitted it….
see wray's 1998 book on the horizontal and vertical components of money supply. the vertical injection comes from the fed and treasury. the horizontal portion is created by banks but is supported by state money (leveraging state money to create private money). bank liabilities are made liquid through Lender of last resort and fdic support from the government.