The Setting Sun – Japan’s Forgotten Debt Problems

In 1979, the publication of Harvard sociologist Ezra Vogel’s international best-selling book Japan as Number 1signalled the nation’s arrival as an economic power. Today, Japan’s industrial and economic decline is palpable.

But in 2012, Japan’s Nikkei 225 stock average rose by around 23%. Much of the increase reflects faith in the reflation strategy of second time Prime Minster Shinzo Abe to increase growth through an additional US$120 billion of public spending, create inflation to reduce the debt to GDP ratio and devalue the Yen. The strategies, which have all been tried before with limited success, may not restore the health of the Japanese economy.

Dark Statistics…

In the post war period, Japan enjoyed decades of strong economic growth – around 9.5% per annum between 1955 and 1970 and around 3.8% per annum between1971 and 1990. Since the collapse of the Japanese debt bubble in 1989/ 1990, Japanese growth has been sluggish, averaging around 0.8% per annum. Nominal gross domestic product (“GDP”) has been largely stagnant since 1992. Japan’s economy operates far below capacity, with the output gap (the difference between actual and potential GDP) being around 5- 7%.

The Japanese stock market is around 70-80% below its highs at the end of 1989. The Nikkei Index fell from its peak of 38,957.44 at the end of 1989 to a low of 7,607.88 in 2003. It now trades around 8,000-12,000. Japanese real estate prices are at the same levels as 1981. Short term interest rates are around zero, under the Bank of Japan’s (“BoJ”) Zero Interest Rate (“ZIRP”) policy which has been in place for over a decade. 10 year Japanese government bonds yield around 1.00% per annum.

Since 1990, public finances have deteriorated significantly. Government spending to stimulate economic activity has outstripped tax revenues, resulting in a sharp increase in Japanese government gross debt to around 240% of GDP. Net debt (which excludes debt held by the government itself for monetary, pension and other reasons) is about 135%. The US government has gross and net debt of 107% and 84%. Total gross debt (government, non-financial corporation and consumer) is over 450% of GDP, compared to around 280% for the US.

Japan’s demographics parallel its economic decline. Japan’s population is forecast to decline from its current level of 128 million to around 90 million by 2050 and 47 million by 2100. A frequently repeated joke states that in 600 hundred years based on the present rate of decline there will be 480 Japanese left.

The proportion of Japan’s population above 65 years will rise from 12% of the total population to around 23%. Japan’s work force is expected to fall from 70% currently by around 15% over the next 20 years. For every two retirees there will be around three working people, down from six in 1990.

According to one forecast by 2050, Japan will have a median age of 52, the oldest society ever known. Currently sales of adult diapers now exceed those intended for babies.

Japan’s problems have been compounded by two major natural disasters – the 1994 Kobe earthquake and the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami.

In the face of the nation’s long term decline, Japanese politics has become increasingly fractious. Frequent changes of leadership, often driven by arcane internal factional politics, have created an unstable environment and a lack of policy continuity. Japan has had seven prime ministers in six years and six finance ministers in three years. Former Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva once joked that in Japan you say good morning to one prime minister and good afternoon to another.

Origins of the Crisis…

Japan’s post war economic success, like that in Germany, was based on an export driven economic model, using low costs and manufacturing competence. An under-valued Yen provided Japanese exporters with a competitive advantage.

The Plaza Accord signed on 22 September 1985 called for France, West Germany, Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom to devalue the dollar in relation to the Japanese Yen and German Deutsche Mark by intervening in currency markets. Between 1985 and 1987, the Yen increased in value by 51% against the dollar.

Japan moved from an era of En’yasu, an inexpensive Yen, to a period of Endaka or Endaka Fukyo, an expensive Yen. The higher Yen adversely affected Japanese exporters. Japanese economic growth fell sharply, from 4.4% in 1985 to 2.9% in 1986.

Desperate to restore growth and offset the stronger Yen, the Japanese authorities eased monetary policy with the BoJ cutting interest rates from 5% to 2.5% between January 1986 and February 1987. The lower rates led to a rapid increase in debt funded investment, driving real estate and stock prices higher. At the peak of the “bubble” economy, the 3.41 square kilometre (1.32 square miles) area of the Tokyo Imperial Palace had a theoretical value greater than all the real estate in the state of California.

Seeking to reverse the unsustainable asset price inflation, the authorities increased interest rates to 6% between 1989 and 1990 triggering the collapse of the boom. As Japan’s economic problems worsened rapidly, the government responded with large fiscal stimulus programs. The BoJ cut interest rates to zero. But the policy measures failed to revive the economy, which slid into deflation.

There was a parallel deterioration in public finances. At the time of collapse of the bubble economy, Japan’s budget was in surplus and government gross debt was around 20% of GDP. As the Japanese economy stagnated, weak tax revenues and higher government spending to resuscitate growth created substantial budget deficits.

Japan’s total tax revenue is currently at a 24 year low. Corporate tax receipts have fallen to 50 year lows. Japan now spends more than 200 Yen for every 100 Yen of tax revenue received.

The period of Japanese economic decline was known as the Lost Decade or Ushinawareta Jūnen. As the economy failed to recovery and the problems extended beyond 2000, it has come to be referred to as the Lost Two Decades or the Lost 20 Years (Ushinawareta Nijūnen).

Japanese Airbags…

Japan’s large pool of savings, low interest rates and a large current account surplus has allowed the build-up of government debt.

Japan has a large pool of savings, estimated at around US$19 trillion, built up through legendary frugality and thrift during the nation’s rise to prosperity after World War II. High savings rates also reflected the country’s young age structure especially until the 1980s, the low level of public pension benefits, the growth of income levels through to the late 1980s, the bonus system of compensation, the lack of availability of consumer credit and incentives for saving.

In recent years, household savings were complemented by strong corporate savings, around 8% of GDP. This reflects slow growth, excess capacity, lack of investment opportunities and caution driven by economic uncertainty.

Much of these savings are invested domestically. A significant amount of the savings is held as bank deposits, including large amounts with the Japanese Postal System. In the absence of demand for credit from borrowers, the banks hold large quantities of government bonds to match the deposits, helping finance the government. Japanese banks hold around 65-75% of all Japanese government bonds (“JGBs”) with the Japanese Postal System being the largest holder. Around 90% of all JGBs are held domestically.

The high levels of debt are sustainable because of low interest rates, driven by the BoJ’s ZIRP and successive rounds of JGB bond purchases as part of quantitative easing (“QE”) programs since 2001. The BoJ balance sheet is now around US$2 trillion an increase from around 10% of Japan’s GDP to 30% since the mid-1990s. BoJ holdings of JGBs are around US$1.2 trillion, around 11% of the total outstanding.

Low interest rates perversely have not discouraged investment in bank deposits or government bonds. This reflects the poor performance of other investments, such as equity and property, during this period. The strong Yen has increased the risk of foreign investments.

Although nominal returns are low, Japanese investors have received high real rates of return, because of falling prices or deflation.

Over the last 50 years, Japan has also run large current account surpluses, other than in 1973–1975 and 1979–1980 when high oil prices led to large falls in the trade balances. The current account surplus has resulted in Japan accumulating foreign assets of around US$4 trillion or a net foreign investment position of approximately 50 % of GDP. This helped Japan avoid the need to finance its budget deficit overseas and also boosted domestic resources, increasing demand for JGBs.

Since the global financial crisis and more recent European debt crisis, Japan has been viewed as a “safe haven”. Investors have purchased Yen and JGBs, pushing rates to their lowest levels in almost a decade and increasing foreign ownership of JGBs to around 9%, the highest level since 1979, the first year for which comparable data is available. These factors have assisted Japan to finance its budget deficit.

Airbags designed to protect occupants of a car from injury in a crash only work once. Similarly, the factors which allowed Japan to increase its government debt levels are unlikely to continue.

Change in the Weather…

Following the collapse of the bubble, policymakers implemented a variety of economic stimulus programs.

Japan’s budget surplus of 2.4% in 1991 has become a chronic budget deficit, increasing from 2.5% in 1993 to about 8% by the end of the 1990s. It has remained high during the 2000s. The BoJ has tried unsuccessfully to increase inflation to reduce debt. Japanese inflation has averaged minus 0.2% in the 2000s, a decline from levels of 2.5% in the 1980s and 1.2% in the 1990s. The policies have failed to restore economic growth, trapping Japan in a period of economic stagnation.

Nomura economist Richard Koo argues that Japan is experiencing a “balance sheet recession”, triggered by the collapse of financial asset prices. Financially insolvent firms are reducing debt – deleveraging- despite low interest rates. This is evidenced by a sharp fall in investment (currently around 22% of GDP, down from 32% in 1990) and corporations becoming net savers from net borrowers.

Private consumption is weak, falling to about 57% of GDP, further reducing domestic demand. This reflects weak employment, lack of growth in income and the aging population. Strong exports and a current account surplus have partially offset the lack of domestic demand, as firms focused on overseas markets.

With investment and consumption weak, large budget deficits have supported economic activity, avoiding an even larger downturn in economic activity.

In a balance sheet recession, monetary policy is ineffective with limited demand for credit. GDP tends to decline by the amount of debt repayment and un-borrowed individual savings. Government stimulus spending is the primary driver of growth.

Given the strategies have been tried unsuccessfully before, the Prime Minster Shinzo’s policies have a desperate quality. Although the measures will provide a short term lift in economic activity, it is unlikely to create a sustainable recovery.  They will increase the budget deficit and government debt levels.

Continued economic weakness, a decline in savings rates and a reversal of the current account surplus make the Japanese government debt burden increasingly unsustainable.

Getting Poorer at Home…

The Japanese government’s ability to finance spending is increasingly constrained by falling Japanese household savings rates, which have declined from between 15% and 25% in the 1980s and 1990s to under 3%, a level below the US until recently. This decline reflects decreasing income and the aging population.

At around 5%, Japan’s unemployment rates are low relative to international peers but higher than the 2-3% levels that existed prior to 1991. The official rate understates real unemployment because of government employment adjustment subsidies and structural change in the Japanese labour to lower costs to offset the impact of a higher Yen and global competition.

Wage have fallen with average annual salaries including bonuses falling every year since 1999 and decreasing by around 12% in total. Between 1994 and 2007, labour costs as a percentage of manufacturing output declined from73% to 49%. Japanese worker’s share of GDP fell to 65% in 2007, from a peak of 73% in 1999.

In a change from the tradition of lifetime employment, 34% of the labour force (around) 20 million workers are employed in part-time or contract roles, an increase from 20% in 1990. These workers do not have job security, training or benefits associated with full time work.

In 2009, previously unreleased government statistics revealed that 15.7% of Japanese, including 14% of children and 21% of the elderly, live below the poverty line.

The aging population further reduces the savings rate. Household surveys indicate that around a quarter of households with two people or more have no employment.  In aggregate, the amount of money being paid to retirees from savings exceeds the amount of new money that is going into savings funds. This is compounded by low returns on investments which accelerates the rundown of savings.

Getting Poorer Abroad…

Japan’s current account surplus has also allowed the government to run large budget deficits which can be funded domestically. Since 2007, the Japanese trade account surplus has fallen sharply, turning into a deficit in 2012.

The secular factors driving the fall include an appreciating Yen and slower global growth, which has reduced demand for Japanese products, such as cars and consumer electronics. In late 2012, territorial disputes with China exacerbated the decline in exports. It also reflects the impact of the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami as well as the subsequent decision to shut down Japanese nuclear power generators, which increased energy imports, especially Liquid Natural Gas.

Deep seated structural factors also underlie changes in the trade account. Since the 1980s, rising costs and the higher Yen have driven Japanese firms to relocate some production facilities overseas, taking advantage of lower labour costs and circumventing trade barriers. More advanced, technologically complex and high value manufacturing was kept in Japan. But post 2007 Japanese firms have increasingly been forced to close these domestic production facilities as they have become uncompetitive.

The combination of falling exports, lower saving rates, declining corporate earnings and cash surpluses is likely to move the Japanese current account into deficit. In turn, this will force Japan to become a net importer of capital to finance government spending, altering the dynamics of its finances.

The Way It Ends…

If Japan continues to run large budget deficits, as is likely, then the falling saving rate and reversal in its current account will make it more difficult for the government to borrow, at least at current low rates.

Ignoring foreign borrowing and debt monetisation by the central bank, the stock of private sector savings limits the amount of government debt. In the case of Japan, this equates to around 250-300% of GDP. Japan’s gross government debt will reach this level around 2015, although net government debt will not reach this limit until after 2020.

Even  before Japan’s government debt exceed household’s financial assets, the declining savings rate and increasing drawing on savings by aging households will reduce inflows into JGBs making domestic funding of the deficit more difficult.

Insurance companies and pension funds are increasingly selling their holdings or reducing purchases to fund the increase in payouts to people eligible for retirement benefits. Institutional investors and to a lesser extent retail investors are also increasingly investing in other assets, including foreign securities, in an effort to increase returns and diversify their portfolios.

Forecast current account deficits will complicate the government’s financing task. Japan’s large merchandise trade surplus has shrunk and will remain under pressure reflecting weak export demand and high imported energy costs.

Japan’s large portfolio of foreign assets will cushion the effects for a time. Japan has accumulated large foreign assets totalling around US$4 trillion, making it the world’s biggest net international creditor. The BoJ is the largest investor in US Treasury bonds, with holdings of around US$1 trillion. But even if net income from foreign assets (interest payments, profits and dividends) stays constant, Japan’s overall current account may move into deficit as soon as 2015.

As the drawdown on financial assets to finance retirement accelerates, Japan will initially run down its overseas investments, losing its net foreign asset position. Unless public finances improve, Japan ultimately will be forced to finance its budget deficit by borrowing overseas.

Where the marginal buyers of JGBs are foreign investors rather than domestic Japanese investors, interest rates may increase, perhaps significantly. Even at current low interest rates, Japan spends around 25-30% of its tax revenues on interest payments. At borrowing costs of 2.50% to 3.50% per annum, two to three times current rates, Japan’s interest payments will be an unsustainable proportion of tax receipts.

Higher interest rates will also trigger problems for Japanese banks, Japanese pension funds and insurance companies, which also have large holdings of JGBs.

JGBs total around 24% of all bank assets, which is expected to rise to 30% by 2017. An increase in JGB yields would result in immediate mark-to-market large losses on existing holdings, although higher returns would boost income longer term. BoJ estimates that a 1% rise in rates would cause losses of US$43 billion for major banks, equivalent to 10% of Tier 1 Capital for major banks or 20% for regional banks.

To avoid the identified chain of events, Japan must address the core problems. But reductions in the budget deficit are difficult. Spending on social security accounts and interest expense now totals a major part of government spending. Increasing health and aged care costs are expected by 2025 to be around 10-12% of GDP.  An aging population and shrinking workforce will continue to drive slower growth and lower tax revenues. Tax increases are politically unpopular. Reductions in the budget deficit are likely to reduce already weak economic activity, compounding the problems.

Japanese policy makers have other options. Financial repression forcing investment in low interest JGBs is one alternative. The BoJ can maintain its zero rate policy and monetise debt to finance the government. Japan can try to inflate away their debt. But ultimately, Japan may have no option other than a domestic default to reduce its debt levels.

Older Japanese, especially retirees who are major holders of JGBs, would suffer large losses. Younger Japanese would benefit from the reduction in debt and reduced claims on future tax revenues. Such a drastic alternative, with its massive economic and social costs, is difficult to conceive other than as the last option.

Cassandra in Japan…

Investors and traders have repeatedly bet on a Japanese crisis, usually by short selling JGBs to benefit from higher rates. With low Japanese interest rates, the risk of the trade has always seemed limited while the potential profit large. But the bet has failed each time, giving the strategy its name – the widow maker.

Given its large domestic savings and also the ability of the BoJ to further monetise its debt, the status quo can be maintained for a little longer. But eventually Japan’s deteriorating public finances and declining ability to finance itself domestically will coincide with weakening ratings and large refinancing needs.

Japan’s deteriorating public finances and declining ability to finance itself domestically will coincide with weakening ratings and large refinancing needs.

Although no longer AAA since May 2009, Japan currently has a strong debt rating – AA3 (Moody’s Investor Services) from or AA minus (Standard & Poor’s). In 2012, Fitch downgraded the country’s credit rating to A plus from AA. Its rapidly deteriorating financial position will place continuing pressure on its rating, making fund raising more difficult and expensive especially outside Japan.

Japan has an average debt maturity of 6 years, shorter than Spain, Italy and France. Around 60% of its debt must be refinanced in the next 5 years. This will expose Japan to the discipline of market investors at a vulnerable moment.

Once the problems emerge, they will be difficult to contain. As Economist Rudiger Dornbush once observed: “The crisis takes a much longer time coming than you think, and then it happens much faster than you would have thought”.

This piece is cross-posted from Naked Capitalism with permission.

17 Responses to "The Setting Sun – Japan’s Forgotten Debt Problems"

  1. Burk   January 15, 2013 at 4:54 pm

    This completely and utterly misunderstands the situation. A typical neoliberal rant.

    The government debt ("poor" and "deteriorating", and all those bad words, etc…) is equivalent to private wealth. And the savings rate have been so high that Japan doesn't need more savings.. it has plenty. With the demographic change, it will become a more consumption oriented economy, and less savings-oriented. This will allow the tax system to gather more and borrow less, as savings desires decline. It will become a more normal economy.

    The only relevant figure is inflation. As long as that stays low, the government is free to borrow and/or spend more. And should do so, as long as deflation threatens as now. No matter the inflation rate, the government needs to keep the real economic capacity high, educating its population and keeping infrastructure up to date.

    Japan doesn't rely on outside bond vigilantes to fund its deficits.. it relies on internal savers. At any rate, once interest rates go up and deflation is solved, borrowing can go down since stimulus is no longer needed, and taxation can rise. It is no problem.

    • StephenCheng   January 16, 2013 at 7:39 pm


      Quoted from your words:
      "Japan doesn't need more savings.. it has plenty. With the demographic change, it will become a more consumption oriented economy, and less savings-oriented. This will allow the tax system to gather more and borrow less, as savings desires decline. It will become a more normal economy."

      Are you telling us that Japanese government has already been raking in more tax revenues over the past decades and becoming a more "normal economy" in the process? If so, do you have data to support your statement? Or are you merely predicting a likely scenario down the road?

      Maybe this is the reason why the Japanese government has been running huge deficits for years —- because they are expecting explosive increase in tax revenue from its aging population soon.

  2. Burk   January 16, 2013 at 7:57 pm

    Thanks for the response.

    Japan hasn't been running deficits because it can not get enough in taxes. Nor is it beset with an irrational anti-tax political system. It has been running deficits to stimulate its economy and prop up its banks, just not enough to quite get over the hump.

    I was speaking of the future, (note the word "will"), as perforce its aged population will start spending more than it is saving. Then the government won't have to back-fill as much to replace the missing spending in the general economy with its deficits. They are very close to that point now.

    The amount they get in taxes is up to them to choose. It is not a question of magic. The main determinant is the macroeconomic position. As long as deflation threatens, they need to spend more than they tax.

    This is all elementary MMT economics.. I would recommend looking into it.

    • burktheidiot   January 21, 2013 at 1:24 pm

      Want to put your money where your mouth is? I know where you can buy all the JGBs you like. Let's see how you've done in ten years.

    • Vegard Aaberge   August 5, 2013 at 7:36 am

      What kind of silly economics is that. They can choose how much they get in taxes?! How exactly? You do realize that a massive tax increase will make the economy collapse? If it was that easy, why didn't Greece just choose to have a higher tax revenue.

      Actually it is not difficult to understand what the true problem is in Japan. There is in imbalance of spending due to the greying of the country. The elderly in Japan is creating the deficit. So what Japan is actually doing is borrowing money from the working class to transfer money to the elderly. That can not last indefinitely, because the number of people supporting the system is dropping and the number of dis-savers is increasing.

      What needs to be done is stop that trend. The out of control benefits for the elderly needs to be cut, and taxes needs to be aimed towards people with large amount of savings. Any stimulus program should be used for the working class.

      Of course this will never happen, because they will lose the elderly vote, but that is what need to happen.

  3. John   January 21, 2013 at 12:18 pm

    Wow, the elderly will turn to consumption and fund the Japanese government with increased taxes! That would be a first in history as the elderly tend to have all that they need and cut back on consumption when they retire. Their only increased consumption will be in healthcare.
    Perhaps the commentor should take some basic lessons in demographics and economics.

  4. commonsensesd   January 22, 2013 at 1:31 am

    Burk, I will admit your arguments might sound good to some liberal academic college freshman or a parasitic blood sucking bureaucrat ,but to the rest of us hard working small business owners it sounds like a bunch snake oil ,entitlement bullshit.

  5. Blue Republic   January 23, 2013 at 11:07 am

    Very exhaustive and well-written. (but the PM's family name is Abe, Shinzo is
    his given name).

    There are going to be some real unpleasant outcomes from all of this, and
    although there are positive things Japan *could* be doing – such as encouraging
    landed immigration schemes to revitalize agriculture, forestry or fishing. Or
    something to encourage foreigners to take over small-scale manufacturing
    enterprises that are now dying on the vine…

    You can pretty well bet that very little meaningful *will* happen short of citizens
    rampaging and breaking out the torches and pitchforks. Abe and the LDP don't have
    a clue about doing anything besides keeping the benefits flowing to the connected.
    And even if they did, the people with the real power keep a low profile – the
    politicians are mainly there for theater.

    It looks like they will just QE themselves into hyperinflation, eventually, unless
    some other disaster happens first. The responsible thing would be just to default,
    but good luck with that ever occurring.

    Something not mentioned:

    The recovery from the March 11 earthquake is, predictably being corruptly and
    inefficiently handled, at great expense.

    *But* even the low-end prediction for the damage from the next likely earthquake/
    tsunami – along the Nankai trough off the Pacific coast of central Honshu – are
    much higher than that of March 11. Casualty estimates run from 30,000 to over
    300,000, and big parts of the industrial heartland of the country would be heavily

    I think "trainwreck" is a pretty reasonable call here..

  6. BrainSmart Blog   February 11, 2013 at 9:59 am

    A very interesting debate in the comments to this article but they dont address the very real situation here , which is we have an aging population who are living longer and a younger population with poor job prospects and rampant long term inflation and debt problems .

  7. joseph glynn   February 13, 2013 at 6:13 pm

    Great essay, thank-you.
    By the way,…Japan raised over 70% of its total tax revenues in the 1870's by taxing land and it was the continuance of land value taxation which leveled the playing pitch and laid the foundation for its' subsequent economic success. Land value taxation could re-orient the banks and kill off the cancer of the two ancient, colluding private monopolies; that of landowners and bankers who strangle economies with the unsustainable burden of inflated land prices, mountainous debt burdens and excessive rents and interest payments. As Japan shows there is no easy..and I would argue, no other way out.

  8. B Org   May 6, 2013 at 5:19 am

    Well the news is saying that japanese middle class income has shrank drammatically in relation to their government debt. Nowadays many young couple cannot dare to have child over there. Something out of text book case is cooking up there.

  9. larzze   July 12, 2013 at 11:04 am

    Japan is one of the world's strongest country. Growing rapidly with health economy. Having big opportunities for investors. Invest in Kenya

  10. Rine   August 7, 2013 at 12:41 pm

    The easier rates accelerated a quick expand in obligation subsidized speculation, driving land and stock costs higher. Looking to turn around the unsustainable holding value swelling, the powers expanded investment rates to 6% between 1989 and 1990 triggering the cave in of the blast attorney personal injury

  11. larzze   August 10, 2013 at 11:05 pm

    Government won't have to back-fill as much to replace the missing spending in the general economy with its deficits. They are very close to that point now. TSK

  12. Jeff   August 27, 2013 at 12:03 am

    @ joseph glynn: But how does this contrast with the way the United States raised wealth? Surely it wasn't through taxation of land but rather through innovation and positioning itself as the center of a global economy. Land taxation may work in the short term but in the long term I don't expect it to be much use, even to a struggling economy.