The well-regarded and surprisingly independent Beijing-based media outlet Caijing is no more. The site is up, but the content is frozen in time, nothing having been written since early November. Happily, Caijing editor Hu Shuli has now re-appeared with Caing. And Caing has started things off where Caijing left off, drawing attention to the bubble economy China has become.
Andy Xie writes today:
The biggest risk to China’s economy is the desire to maintain past economic growth rates by maximizing investments in property — an unproductive asset. It supports short-term growth by sacrificing long-term growth as capital’s average productivity declines over time.
Local government performance in China is measured according to GDP and fiscal revenue. Property development can achieve high numbers for both quickly. This is why property’s share in China’s capital allocation is rapidly rising as prices appreciate and volumes increase. This is a politically driven bubble — and it’s already massive. Unless the trend is reversed by reforming incentives for local governments, China’s property bubble could mushroom in two years from what’s now a dangerous level. The burst could happen in 2012, endangering social and political stability.
The statistics support Xie’s view that China is overheating. This morning we heard that both China’s exports and imports were surging on the back of strong economic growth. Exports were up a gargantuan 17.7% from a year earlier, making China the world’s largest exporter, pulling ahead of Germany. Meanwhile imports were up three times as much, an eye-popping 55.9% year-on-year. Clearly, domestic demand is strong. Will this take pressure off of China to revalue it’s currency? I doubt it. China still had a monthly $18.4 billion trade surplus despite the surge in imports.
What’s more, China’s peg to the dollar means it is forced to ‘import’ the easy American monetary policy, leading to a surge in the Chinese money supply. And while the money multiplier in the U.S. is falling because of weak credit demand, China has the opposite problem. And the Chinese are sticking to an expansionary fiscal stance nonetheless.
Despite the indications of gathering economic momentum, Finance Minister Xie Xuren said China would stick to its pro-growth fiscal stance, warning that withdrawing stimulus spending too early could damage the economy.
New loans amounted to about 600 billion yuan ($88 billion) in the first week of January, nearly twice as much as the monthly average in the second half of 2009, banking sources said, confirming a media report earlier.
Corporate treasurers see tighter monetary policy down the road and as a result are front-loading their funding needs. That may only make officials move quicker to normalize policy, Isaac Meng, an economist with BNP Paribas in Beijing, said.
“In terms of credit controls, our expectations for a hike in reserve requirements should be brought forward from the end of the first quarter,” said Meng, who had penciled in loan growth of 800 billion yuan for all of January.
“Inflation is heading to 3-4 percent in the next few months. It is no longer just expectations, it is becoming a reality,” he said. China’s consumer price index rose 0.6 percent in the year to November, which marked the first increase since January.
How are local governments dealing with inflationary pressures in this top-down environment? Andy Xie says they are looking to property development.
China needs to depend more on improved efficiency for growth. But instead, the recent trend seems to be going the other way. Rising costs and weak demand are making manufacturing less profitable. Hence, capital investment is weak, as reflected in weak equipment import data.
Most local governments seem to embrace property development as a growth savior. But shifting surplus capital into property is likely to lower future growth by decreasing average capital efficiency. This deters consumption development by increasing property expenditure expectations, and threatens financial stability by increasing loan levels, using overvalued land as collateral.
This is a bubble, and as with all bubbles, it will end badly. Xie says the bubble is now supported in the main only by cheap money where strong export-demand growth had sustained it in the past. The recent trade statistics seem to confirm this view. Xie believes the Chinese cannot look to appreciate their currency to keep the gravy train going, as Japan did post-Plaza Accord during its own Bubble Economy. This is unlikely to work in China’s case because China relies on cost more than technology as an advantage in exports, Xie says. The Japanese were at the cutting edge and could absorb the costs of a revaluation, while the Chinese cannot.
Xie says that China’s growth model is unsustainable because it produces what I would call a Latin American style distribution of income where the middle class is quite small. These comments echo thoughts from former Xie’s Morgan Stanley colleague Stephen Roach, who sees an economic safety net as critical to increasing domestic demand and forming the middle class of which Xie speaks.
Bottom line, China’s economy is a bubble economy right now. And bubbles do not deflate; they pop.
Trapped Inside A Property Bubble – Andy Xie
See also Contrarian Investor Predicts Economic Crash in China from the New York Times
Originally published at Credit Writedowns and reproduced here with the author’s permission.
Opinions and comments on RGE EconoMonitors do not necessarily reflect the views of Roubini Global Economics, LLC, which encourages a free-ranging debate among its own analysts and our EconoMonitor community. RGE takes no responsibility for verifying the accuracy of any opinions expressed by outside contributors. We encourage cross-linking but must insist that no forwarding, reprinting, republication or any other redistribution of RGE content is permissible without expressed consent of RGE.