Is Argentina running out of funds?

The Argentine government is, apparently, in the process of reabsorbing the retirement and pension system privatized in the 1990s’. The official argument, of course, is the international financial crisis. (Wasn’t Argentina de-coupled, and totally resilient to the crisis, as per the authorities?). I would interpret it differently, though. The government seems unable to rein in public expenditures. In turn, this is worsened by 2009 being an election year in the context of an economy that slowdowns markedly (and mainly due to internal wrong macro-management much more than and prior to the external shock), and very limited financial access—I have elaborated extensively on these topics in previous posts and the use of temporary high tax revenues to finance quasi-permanent expenditures. You can also add a presidential image that plummeted through 2008. Thus, the government is desperate to obtain funds to increase expenditures, which are quite scarce for Argentina.

Some commentators argue that the external shock calls for a fiscal response to smooth the business cycle—that should not exist in the first place as per the previous calculations of the government regarding the international shock. Isn’t the U.S. doing it? But Argentina is not the U.S. Clearly, its default history differs substantially, as well as respect for property rights; and the list follows on and on. Only when a country’s reputation is high enough is that economy able to step in to temporarily buy equity in firms to stabilize a crisis. This does not apply to Argentina’s current administration.

But this is not new. The Kirchners ‘administration have made use of this “tricks” more than once—and so did Peron. In the name of retired people’s benefits—not true, though—the administration is able to obtain current funds that otherwise will be unable to borrow. The intertemporal magnitude of this is not trivial: by acquiring the present flow of funds to finance current (but potentially quasi-permanent) expenditures, the federal government also incurs in present and, more importantly, future liabilities (mainly not taken into account)—not to mention the efficiency losses derived from “governmental” managers not usually chosen due to their technical ability. Will this affect the future ability to roll-over debt? This is still an open question. No wonder that Argentina’s country-risk increased—and might keep on increasing. Furthermore, the short run impact of this affect the banking system—probably the only sector with some resilience of the crisis, since the real sector will be strongly affected.

Add to the latter that the government wants to exchange its debt—so as to transfer over time the burden of capital repayment—would you like to be in charge in 2011? I wonder if someone will…

Finally, let me comment on the response of the current administration to the international financial crisis. The idea seems to be to increase public expenditures (as mentioned above), closing the economy and potentially gradually depreciating the exchange rate. Closing the economy is not the right answer. The adjustment of the exchange rate would have been correct, provided that the past macroeconomic policy had been responsible—the latter not being true. Had Argentina respected property rights, not manipulated inflation and other official data, pumping up the economy to increase inflation, stimulated investment (instead of only consumption) and productivity, etc, the answer would have been different. But now, however, there is higher probability that changes in the exchange rate will be transferred to prices—nobody will be surprised why this did not happen in Brazil or Chile, right? The administration preferred not to slow down the economy to control the inflation rate when things were manageable. May be it is time to start paying the bills (sooner rather later).

4 Responses to "Is Argentina running out of funds?"

  1. Hector Rubini   October 22, 2008 at 7:33 am

    Muy bien escrito, che. Imposible estar en desacuerdo.Bienaventurados los que por suerte estan fuera de este condenado país. Vendrán cosas peores. Este es apenas el inicio de un proyecto de estado burocrático-autoritario a la Onganía, que hasta no empezar a asesinar personas no va a parar. Mientras la oposicion siga desorganizada tienen cancha libre. Un abrazo! HECTOR

    • Martin   October 22, 2008 at 9:34 am

      Jamas podran salir adelante si no respetan los derechos de propiedad. La historia Argentina es un triste ejemplo de confiscaciones e incumplimientos de compromisos. Asi no hay inversion ni ahorro posibles. Estoy de acuerdo en que vendran cosas peores, mas alla del marco economico. Creo que con esta concepcion estatista totalitaria estan amenazadas las libertades individuales, y eso es mucho mas peligroso. Tal vez deberian irse mientras puedan hacerlo. Suerte!!!

      • Free Tibet   October 22, 2008 at 11:10 am

        Martin, eres tu del alrighty now?Vendran cosas peores para todos y no escapamos aqui en el norte donde han gastado todo el dinero que tenemos y todo que tendremos solo para salvar unos tios en los bancos para que ellos tendran para darnos prestamos – con interesas! Que no es logico. Tampoco es muy diferente robar a la gente hoy que obligar el futuro con estos gastos que no esten ellos de acuerdo pagar.Pues bueno. Donde hay dinero hay robos. Estoy contigo. Estoy convencido que por el parte economico estamos bien jjjjjj. Y esta hecho. No hay que discutirlo mas. El peligro es perder tambien las libertades. Que es casi seguro tambien porque los politicos son empleados de los bancos. Ojo.

  2. buildcastles   October 22, 2008 at 10:39 am

    Enjoyed the comment about Argentina not repaying debts. I’ve waited 20 years for the USA Fed to balance our budget. Ha!